MIN
Basketball · NBA · G · #10
← All playersMike Conley
Minnesota Timberwolves · 54 games, 15 as a starter · 18.4 min
Compare opens a player picker · 2025-26 regular season · latest
Points / g4.5Last 5 8.4
Rebounds / g1.70.3 off
Assists / g2.90.6 TO
True shooting51.7%46.5% EFG
Plus/minus+0.3Per game
Minutes / g18.454 GP · 15 GS
Season by season
| Season | Team | GP | Min | Pts | Reb | Ast | FG% | 3P% | TS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | MIN | 54 | 18.4 | 4.5 | 1.7 | 2.9 | 33.5% | 33.7% | 51.7% |
| 2024-25 | MIN | 71 | 24.7 | 8.2 | 2.6 | 4.5 | 40.0% | 41.0% | 57.3% |
| 2023-24 | MIN | 76 | 28.8 | 11.4 | 2.9 | 5.9 | 45.7% | 44.2% | 62.7% |
| 2022-23 | MIN +1 | 67 | 30.2 | 11.9 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 42.8% | 38.5% | 58.3% |
| 2021-22 | UTAH | 72 | 28.5 | 13.7 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 43.5% | 40.8% | 57.2% |
| 2020-21 | UTAH | 51 | 29.4 | 16.2 | 3.5 | 6.0 | 44.4% | 41.2% | 58.9% |
| 2019-20 | UTAH | 47 | 29.0 | 14.4 | 3.2 | 4.4 | 40.9% | 37.5% | 53.7% |
| 2018-19 | MEM | 70 | 33.4 | 21.1 | 3.4 | 6.4 | 43.8% | 36.4% | 56.9% |
| 2017-18 | MEM | 12 | 31.2 | 17.1 | 2.3 | 4.1 | 38.1% | 31.2% | 52.0% |
| 2016-17 | MEM | 69 | 33.3 | 20.5 | 3.5 | 6.3 | 45.9% | 40.7% | 60.4% |
| 2015-16 | MEM | 56 | 31.3 | 15.3 | 2.9 | 6.1 | 42.2% | 36.3% | 53.8% |
| 2014-15 | MEM | 70 | 31.8 | 15.8 | 3.0 | 5.4 | 44.6% | 38.6% | 55.8% |
| 2013-14 | MEM | 73 | 33.5 | 17.2 | 2.9 | 6.0 | 45.0% | 36.1% | 54.5% |
| 2012-13 | MEM | 80 | 34.5 | 14.6 | 2.8 | 6.1 | 44.0% | 36.1% | 54.9% |
| 2011-12 | MEM | 61 | 35.6 | 12.9 | 2.6 | 6.6 | 43.3% | 37.7% | 52.3% |
| 2010-11 | MEM | 81 | 35.5 | 13.7 | 3.0 | 6.5 | 44.4% | 36.9% | 52.1% |
| 2009-10 | MEM | 80 | 32.1 | 12.0 | 2.4 | 5.3 | 44.5% | 38.7% | 52.6% |
| 2008-09 | MEM | 82 | 30.5 | 10.9 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 44.2% | 40.6% | 54.8% |
| 2007-08 | MEM | 53 | 26.1 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 42.8% | 33.0% | 50.2% |
| Career | 19 SSN | 1225 | 30.7 | 13.6 | 2.9 | 5.5 | — | — | — |
Career is games-weighted across the 19 seasons in the archive — not a complete record for anyone who debuted earlier. The season rows carry rates rather than makes and attempts, so no pooled career percentage can be built from them.